Law Versus Religion

Google Image

Should a man (Almaleki) be charged with the death penalty for [honor] killing his daughter (Noor Almaleki)? According to AZcentral, a man mowed down his daughter and another woman because he wasn't pleased with her ubber western ways. The articles says: 

"Almaleki has admitted killing his daughter because she disgraced the family by not following traditional Iraqi or Muslim values. 

They liken the case to honor killings that occur in the Middle East, Africa and other parts of the world. In tribal societies where the practice occurs, male family members feel they must kill a rebellious female relative who shames them by not adhering to traditional values."

This is another case of extremism which forces religious beliefs to be subject to law. Gosh -- the line between exercising rights and the abuse thereof is so thin. While these honor killings occur around the world, this one in particular is subject to the American justice system, since it took place in Glendale, Arizona. Noor, at 20 years old had her life taken from her because she decided to return to her Arizona boyfriend after her Iraqi marriage to another man.

So should Almaleki be subject to the death penalty for first degree murder, aggravated assault and two counts of leaving the scene of a serious accident.? Well according to an Arizona county prosecutor; "the state can seek the death penalty for any person convicted of first-degree murder if it can prove the existence of at least one aggravating factor, not because of religion."

Interesting....

-O.Lucius

Opening up the conversation.

 Google Image

With the percentage of non-believers in the United States approximately equivalent to the African American population, the Atheist movement is hoping for the same influence in light of the new administration. Recently they got the chance to meet with White house officials to discuss according to ABC news: "religiously based child abuse issues, so-called faith-healing" and religious child care being exempt from some health and safety laws; the "pervasive" religious atmosphere in the military and ways in which troops "with non-theistic views are made to feel unwelcome"; and faith-based initiatives".

The groups was excited to for the briefing with Tina Tchen and Paul Monteiro, the director and associate director of the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs; Bryan H. Samuels, Commissioner of the Administration on Children, Youth and Families at Health and Human Services; and Mazen Basrawi, Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the Department of Justice. They also pointed to the President's inaugural speech in which he includes non-believers in the patchwork that makes America a great nation.

Even though this their first meeting with representatives of the Obama administration, according to ABC news the Coalition has approached the Education Department to ensure that "non-theistic" children are included in the Safe Schools Act, which works to make sure children in American public schools don’t feel threatened by their environment, and to express concern about organizations "like the Good News Club," which allows adults to proselytize to public school students on school grounds.

-O.Lucius

"Progressive Christianity"

Check out this bloggingheads.tv discussion featuring David Gushee & Peter Laarman about "Progressive Christianity" -- the fragmentation of Christian movements in America and the shift from a conservative standpoint to a more moderate expression.

Defining “progressive” Christianity (04:47)
Are we entering a post-Christian-right era? (06:01)
Refocusing the gay marriage argument (08:38)
David and Peter debate faith-based initiatives (09:03)
A call for evangelicals to be more Christ-like (09:40)
The future of evangelical women, from politics to pulpits (08:50)  

You have the right to remain silent....

Google Image

Check out this feature on the recent bill passed by the state of Utah's Senate & House; where a woman could potentially be put into jail if there is suspicion that she tried to terminate her pregnancy. In other words a woman could face prosecution for acts or occurrences that according to the state may  be equivalent to having an abortion.  Click the story's title to read The Political Carnival's take: "Utah Bill Criminalizes Miscarriage".

- O.Lucius

The Book of [Elton] John.

 Google Image

Perhaps its true, that once you're tuned into to something, more and MORE of it tends to pop up. In the latest of re-interpreting the gospel, Sir. Elton John give his take on Jesus Christ. According to him "Jesus was a compassionate, super-intelligent gay man who understood human problems". I'd be the first to surrender that I find homosexuals to be a tad bit more compassionate, but why even go there Sir. Elton? Its seems that with every day followers of the traditional teachings of the Bible are asked to be more tolerant of evolving public opinion. Yet, the same luxury is seldom reciprocated.

CLICK HERE for the original report & a list of other public figures who have "dared to be different".

-O.Lucius

Young Adults More Tolerant, Less Religious.

 

Photo credit: Rytc; C.C. 3.0

A new study from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life takes a look at religious and moral trends amongst Millenials, young adults between the ages of 18-29, reports USA Today. While 26 percent of Millennials do not claim a religious identity and fewer go to church than the generations that preceded them, “they're just about as spiritual as their parents and grandparents were at those ages.” Nonetheless, Millenials are also less likely to pray or believe in God, according to the study.

But this doesn’t by default suggest a more secular bunch. "Where people start is where they end up, or if they move, it's away from religious ties, but they tend not to move on beliefs," Alan Cooperman, associate director of research, told USA Today. In fact, a closer look at the study’s numbers suggest that Millennials and their parents and grandparents may still have some core faith practices in common.

According to the study, among Millenials:

•40% say religion is very important in their lives, similar to 39% of Boomers at the same ages.

•41% report praying daily, like 42% of Gen Xers as young adults.

•53% are "certain God exists;" 55% of Gen Xers were certain at the same ages.

But the commonalities end there. In terms of homosexuality and tolerance, there is a distinct generation gap, reports Reuters. Young adults are nearly twice as likely to agree that homosexuality should be acceptable within society when compared to adults 65 years and up. And those corrupting, violent films out there for our viewing pleasure: Less than a third of Millenials believe Hollywood is a threat to their moral values, while among those 30 and older, 44 percent do.

Interestingly, the gap closes when it comes to evolution. Only 55 percent of Millenials say that evolution is the best theory compared to 47 percent in the older age groups.

-O.Lucius

Relative Gospel.

 

Submitted on Reddit by ewingfield

The above photo is in the top ten of Digg.com's most popular this week, garnering nearly 5,000 re-posts. It says it all in the headline: "WE CAN QUOTE THE BIBLE TOO". This image seems to be one in support of marriage equality. While it is a fair enough gesture, it shows how one can use the words of the Bible to support just about any view. Surely there are instances in the Bible that can be used to support or oppose this ongoing battle over the definition of marriage. However, in such cases when should one see it as legitimate use or possible misinterpretation? Judging from the verse: "A marriage should be considered valid if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin she shall be executed." Deuteronomy 22: 13-21, its trying to highlight that if one is going to use the Bible as a reference point from which others are to live by, then their life should be subject to it as well. However, to play the "devil's advocate", while this excerpt from the Good Book does debunk some arguments as to what symbolizes marriage, it does not by default support marriage equality. As a suggestion, to effectively do so a better biblical reference would need to be presented which specifically undermines the traditionally accepted notion of whom constitutes a marriage.

-O.Lucius

Agenda Behind the Aid.

It’s been one month since mother earth’s voice vibrated through the capital of Haiti, and humanity banded together to muster support in the face of this boundary breaking natural disaster. As the chaos slowly settles, concerns are now arising about whether donations are reaching those for whom its intended. Cell phone companies have experienced backlash from costumers demanding that Haiti donation text message fees be waived. Financial institutions had a similar push back with online donation fees. The prominent aid site YELE HAITI came under scrutiny for their past handling of funds. E-mails circulated asking that donations not be made to the American Red Cross, citing previous glitches in Hurricane Katrina relief.

But one aspect that seems to have been overlooked is the intent of organizations on the ground. My discussions with individuals directly affected by the earthquake unveiled this: The prospect of organizations using this vulnerable time to mask their motives behind the act of service is a growing concern. Recent articles highlighting specific groups and their initiatives, show that this concern goes beyond my casual conversations.

After 10 missionaries were held by the Haitian government for reportedly trying to illegally bring Haitian children into the Dominican Republic, Kathryn Joyce penned a piece for the Dailybeast.com, entitled “ The Evangelical Adoption Campaign.” In it she highlights a new movement amongst the Christian evangelical denomination, which embraces "a new orphan theology that urges Christians to see adoption and “orphan-care” as an integral part of their faith—and a means of spreading the gospel." The article describes the adoption campaign as a holistic pro-life stance.

In other news, Scientologists are carrying out their own aid-driven crusades. An article from The Australian, titled “Scientologists Gain a Foothold in Shattered Haiti,” states "[Haiti] has Roman Catholics, voodoo spiritualists, Protestants, Rastafarians, Jews and Baha'is. Now Haiti, a nation brimming with piety, looks set to be endowed with another belief system: the scientologists say they are here to stay." Pat Harney, spokeswoman for Scientology's Volunteer Ministry Disaster Relief for Haiti, told The Australian she has little doubt that there will be a Haitian Scientology church. This is most unsettling.

The article details how an advance party of Scientologists arrived soon after the earthquake hit, followed by John Travolta and his grand Boeing 707 to deliver military rations, medical supplies, baby items, doctors and, of course, volunteer ministers. Scientologists have also been practicing their “assist” method in Haitian relief hospitals. Spokeswoman Harney stated "a person can be hurting and medical assistance does not work…we help people to locate themselves."

This post is not intended to alienate any particular organization or practice. Rather it seeks to shine some light on instances where aid is not being administered to the people of Haiti solely out of good-will. Taking advantage of anyone while they are in desperate situations should be considered as much of a crime as profiting from, or embezzling donations.

-O.Lucius

Sculpture.

Felipe Morin

Man-kind continually reshapes its ideals in response to present tribulations, and in doing so creates new forums of consciousness that attract followers. With time such actions become bodies of ideologies that are seemingly commonplace. This reorganization of ideals/beliefs is present today in entities both secular and religious. A very recent example was centerfold of a Times of India article entitled "Punjab Sect Declares New Religion."  Following a series of violent acts against prominent members in a Punjabi sect, one if its premier leaders helped to initiate a new extension of the Bhakti movement. On the 633rd birthday of Bhakti Saint Guru Ravidass, Dera Sachkhand Ballan declared a new religious sect. Along with that Dera Ballan declared a seperate religious book, symbol, and motto. According to the article "prior to the Vienna attack on the temple, the Sikh holy book, Guru Granth Sahib, was recited in Ravidass gurudwaras as the voice (baani) of Guru Ravidass. After the attack, Dera Ballan, making a major departure from tradition, did not place the Bir (copy) of Guru Granth Sahib during the Antim Ardas of Sant Ramanand and read only 40 hymns and one 'sloka' of Guru Ravidass, which is part of the Sikh holy book." 

Aside from the specifics of this particular Punjabi sect's practices, fundamentally the idea that certain individuals are allowed to reconstruct practices that have in this case been around for over 600 years is quiet unsettling. Despite there being some opposition in the Punjabi community, and according to the article  the creation of the new sect "triggered debate among religious, social and political sections", it seems that the convolution of  religion and politics persists. Its noted in the article that "the move is said to have had the silent approval of some Congress leaders and administrative officials close to the Dera". Moreover, its believe that this could create socio-political impacts in Punjab and possibly elsewhere. Already attempts by various leaders to meet and negotiate with Dera Ballan have been unsuccessful, yet progress is being made on a new compilation of religious books. These turn of events call into consideration the possibilty of similar acts being initiated else weeks, and where can the line be drawn if at all feasible.

- O.Lucius

An Eye For An Eye (more on Yemen).

Google Image

“Umar Farouk is one of my students; I had communications with him. And I support what he did, as America supports Israel’s killing of Palestinians, and its killing of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

 - Reportedly Anwar al-Awlaki, the fugitive American-born cleric accused of terrorist ties.

Although there are doubt about the authenticity of the recording from which this quote is taken, it's referring to the Nigerian suspect in the American Christmas day airplane bomb attempt. One would interpret this justification of the failed act of terrorism as "an eye for an eye" however, such matters are far more complicated. It should be understood that acts of terrorism undermine the national security of every nation. The catch 22 however, is that acts of killing are being done to stop acts of killing. Also its seems that no one has been able to diplomatically get to the root of what extremist groups and terrorism supporters are trying to convey to the world. Some claim that they are acting in the name of their god, yet opportunistic statements, videos, and unexpected followers are popping up to claim responsibility for such extremism.

Its makes one wonder if this vain dance between the perceived good and bad will ever end. The NY Time article which spotlights this dilemma, mentions that not only did the American-born Anwar al Awlaki have contact with the aformentioned Nigerian terrorist, two of the 9/11 extremists, and the Army Major who committed terrorists acts at the Fort Hood base. He also had a platform from which to influence young Muslim minds. Through Mosques in San Diego, and Virgina the article says "[Awlaki's] eloquent defenses of violent jihad in sermons and on the Internet are widely believed to have radicalized many young Muslims." This is an area that anti-terrorism networks should pay particular attentions to. Not only are extremists coming from different parts of the world, but some of them are being born and bread in the very nation(s) that they are targeting. Much time can be spent on ousting remote cells, like Awlaki's in the remote Shabwa Province in Yemen. Or  more attention can be paid to how extremism is being spread to new impressionable minds. Concerned citizens of the world should want to know how and why these individuals are so affective in spreading their ideals, and how that information can be used  to really make progress in the "war against terror". Clearly this issue is far more layered than the filtered bits that make it to the mainstream, but at the same time it continues to be a growing problem for the global community.

- O. Lucius

Holy War?

 Google Image / ipadrblog.com

 

Why does it seem that in the pursuit of peace, war is always amongst the answers? Isn't war against the purpose of religion; to achieve personal peace, and peace in the world. From the thirty year war of the Holy Roman empire, religious oppression between China and Tibet, the ongoing conflict in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians, the unstable region of Kashmir claimed by both Pakistan and India, to religious extremism in Afghanistan, its seems religious conflict persists. The latest is the threat by Yemeni religious leaders of holy war if foreign troops try to invade Yemen, or any of its surrounding waters. “If any party insists on aggression, or invades the country, then according to Islam, jihad becomes obligatory,” was announced in a statement signed by more than a hundred Yemeni clerics. According to a Times Online article,Yemen is said to be at war with terrorists who are trying to hide out within their boarders. More attention is being places on the region since the Christmas day bombing attempt on a U.S flight, conducted by alQaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, a branch of the terror network centered in Yemen.

More over Yemenese leader's are  suggesting that western forces are planning an Iraq & Afghanistan type invasion. They also claim that an upcoming London conference on Yemen is meant to clear the way for such an invasion. Despite this, the U.S has said that it has no plan on invading Yemen. To the contrary according to Times Online, the chairman of the US Senate’s Armed Services Committee, Carl Levin said “most options ought to be on the table, short of a US invasion."  He even urged the Pentagon to consider targeting alQaeda with armed drones, airstrikes or even covert operations.  On another note, are the people of Yemen including their clerics and leaders wrong for trying to tackle their potential problems internally. The Time Online article closes by saying that [Yemeni officials] "are wary of putting a foreign face on their operations. Arguably western countries have invaded other territories prompted by terrorist threats, which has lead to extended occupations, anti-western sentiments, and unstable territories. Either way, a holy war is an oxymoron. No?

-O.Lucius

God & Plastic Surgery.

TEXT

Interviewer: "You’re a strong Christian. I read your tweets. I know you’re a believer. You believe in God the Creator and God created you."

Heidi: "God created me."

I: "and then Doctor Frank Ryan rebuilt it."

H:  "and God created Dr. Frank Ryan."

I: "Some would say that it seems obvious that you’ve rejected God’s creation."

H: "Or God gave me extra because he knew what I would be doing as a career and blessed me with such a great doctor."

Worship of Nature.

20th Century Fox/AP

 Revelations 7:3: “Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees.”

 

It seems that the arguement for more eco-friendly habits recieved an extra boost from the recent block buster movie Avatar. Decribed by the Associated Press as "The story of the tall blue creatures who inhabit Pandora and contend with humans intent on grabbing the resources of their planet", the movie has made over $1 billion  worldwide. Impressive! Well not so much to the Vatican. A recent review pans James Cameron's latest work as 'bland', for its failure to dig deeper in its story-line which is masked by its spectacular visual-effects. The AP interpreted a main concern with the film for the Vatican, is that it seems to promote contemporary doctrines which support a spiritualism linked to the worship of nature. In other words "nature as religion", a slavation through the love of nature. Really??? This is rather perplexing for me because, while some see the evolution of the earth and nature as divine progression, and that humans have no power in affecting eventual outcomes, can't one love nature and God. While the "Go Green" movement has gotten a bit out of hand in some instances, does Avatar necessarily promote love of nature above all else. I have not seen the film and do not plan on seeing it, but entertainment is entertainment. While there is no way to stop people from taking fiction and making it into their own truths, critiques no matter the source shouldn't stop people from expressing themself artistically. Think of it as contemporary fellowhsip!

 -O. Lucius

PRAYER IN CRISIS

Munoz/Reuters

An injured man carries his dead daughter in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake.

As one who is deeply spiritual and believes in prayer, I'm posting a link to an article I read today because I do believe that while one should pray for those affected by the earthquake in Haiti, the country still needs physical giving to help in the relief efforts.

THIS COMMENT IS POSTED AS FOOD FOR THOUGHT. PLEASE INDULGE IN THE REST OF THE ARTICLE: "Prayer Is No Help to Haiti"

HOW YOU CAN HELP:
TEXT FROM YOUR CELL PHONE "YELE" TO 501501
TEXT FROM YOUR CELL PHONE "HAITI" TO 90999

GET CONSTANT UPDATES ON HAITI AT:
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM 'S HAITI BIG NEWS PAGES

Perspective is Everything.

HOW YOU CAN HELP:
TEXT FROM YOUR CELL PHONE "YELE" TO 501501 
GET CONSTANT UPDATES ON HAITI AT:
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM 'S HAITI BIG NEWS PAGES

I contemplated whether to post this video. However, I thought that the comment could be true of many facets of culture and politics today. [In my lay-man opinion] A lot of people have given their souls to other things than faith. However, why now when a nation has long been plagued by misfortune, attempt to take attention off of the ways it can be helped? I had a conversation with a mentor recently, he said that in writing sometimes its not best to remain neutral. So here for the first time on this blog, I will not merely present the views of stories I find relevant to religious or political discussion. I want to make clear that I respect that everyone has their own opinions, but sometimes people just need to SHUT UP. Realize that the things that inform one's philosophy [Pat Robertson] does not ring true for many others! This kind of talk in my opinion is border-line hate, because it can do more harm than good. On a lighter note here is a more substantive analysis by the Associate Press as to why Haiti repeatedly suffers misfortune:

When it comes to natural disasters, Haiti seems to have a bull's-eye on it. That's because of a killer combination of geography, poverty, social problems, slipshod building standards and bad luck, experts say.

The list of catastrophes is mind-numbing: This week's devastating earthquake. Four tropical storms or hurricanes that killed about 800 people in 2008. Killer storms in 2005 and 2004. Floods in 2007, 2006, 2003 (twice) and 2002. And that's just the 21st Century run-down.

If you want to put the worst case scenario together in the Western hemisphere (for disasters), it's Haiti," said Richard Olson, a professor at Florida International University who directs the Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas project. 

"There's a whole bunch of things working against Haiti. One is the hurricane track. The second is tectonics. Then you have the environmental degradation and the poverty," hesaid.

More updates of this kind can be found HERE at the Huffington Post.

****and in the spirit of collaboration****

According to the AFP President Obama is calling on two former Commander-in-chiefs to spearhead U.S relief efforts in Haiti, Pres. Bill Clinton & Pres. George W. Bush.****

Dear Muslim World...

(Inside the Dome of the Rock, mosque in Jerusalem/photo by Mohsin Mohi-Ud-Din)

Special Mention: 

A Letter From A Muslim American.

My good friend Mohsin Mohi-ud Din's second installment for a series he is writing to address Islam and the ever-increasing tension of being a Muslim in America.

Please read the article HERE and be enlightened.

Preaching from the Sidelines.

O.Lucius c) 2009-10

 
The prospect of same-sex marriage has had an interesting effect on the relationship between clergy and elected officials in D.C. According to an article entitled "Church's influence on politics shifting" by Tim Craig and Hamil R. Harris of the Washington Post, there has been a lot of grumbling in the District's religious community about the neglect from local politicians. In lieu of the measure that would legalize same-sex unions in D.C many religious representatives have not been able to voice their concerns. Members of African American churches like Rev. Patrick J. Walker of the New Macedonia Baptist Church in Southeast, feel as though the city which was central to the Civil Rights Movement is changing to become less "church friendly". However, while the population continues to shift in D.C with African American's moving to the out skirts, and younger populations on the influx, this is not a consensus. There are many clergy that support the same-sex measure along with 11 of the 13 city council members, and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty. According to the same article, "more than 200 local religious leaders have come out in favor of same-sex marriage, reflecting the large network of progressive churches in the city. " Some religious officials are steering clear of the the debate all together, giving the politically correct response of there being more important concerns that need our attention.While others go to what they know best, their religious principles to inform their perspective on the issue. Rev. Derrick Harkins, 50, pastor of 19th Street Baptist Church says scripture informs his understanding. He says: "But that may not be relevant to someone who doesn't form their life around the understanding of the Bible. . . . I would never, never want to say or do anything that marginalizes or dehumanizes anyone."

...the measure has since passed in the District of Columbia.

- O.Lucius

Religious fre-- wait not so fast..

Google Image
π

"We are encouraged by this growing recognition by governments and religious leaders that extremism is a common enemy and that freedom and respectful religious coexistence are critical to our shared future,"

- State Department's report on religious freedom in 198 countries released 10/26/09

Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in response to the efforts by the Organization of the Islamic Conference to seek "defamation of religions" resolutions at the United Nations, said "individual's ability to practice his or her religion has no bearing on others' freedom of speech." However, being able to express your religion freely in one part of the world does not make it absolute. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) regard countries like Pakistan and Vietnam as areas of concern, when it comes to individuals rights to religious freedoms. Under the United States Constitution American people generally enjoy freedom of speech, a privilege that is not particularly universal. Perhaps this is why Secretary Clinton could say that one's freedom of speech can not be affected by another's right to religious freedom. Under freedom of speech, Americans are able to respond to things that they do not agreed with, or perhaps have some sort of dialogue to address the issue. However, consider other nations like China were according to the religious freedoms report, "repression of religious freedom remained severe in Tibetan areas." And if religious freedom and freedom of speech don't have any bearing on the other, then what is to be said for the State Department's department of Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor which is set to release a new list of countries of concern in January 2010?

-O. Lucius

A Thin Line between Love and Hate.

After reading an article today entitled " Toronto imam preaching hate instead of harmony" a question immediately came to mind. Is there really room for complete tolerance when it comes to religion? The more I think about it, the more questions arise. Can a person completely believe in one's faith practices without infringing on the practices of others? Who is to judge when someone's complete immersion in their religion, which entails spreading "their gospel" has gone to far? This one article is an example of conflict stemming from perspective. Imam Saed Rageah at the North York's Abu Huraira Centre in Toronto, Canada called on Allah (the Islamic word for God) to "protect us [Muslims] from the fitna [sedition] of these people [Christians and Jews]." He continues, "Allah protect us [Muslims] from the evil agenda of these people; Allah destroy them from within themselves, and do not allow them to raise their heads in destroying Islam." All of this anger-filled language stemmed from his opposition with Christians and Jews, as well as Muslims (who sought alliance with them) to pass legislation in Canada to ban face coverings for Muslim women. Imam Rageah believes that a liberty of Muslim women was being infringed upon. According to the article Imam Rageah continues his preaching saying, "I'm appealing to the congregation not [to] allow such foolish people to be in charge of the affairs of the umma [family of all Muslims] to the point they would make such serious decisions for us. Our wives have the right to wear it. We should not allow them to dictate how we live. What we should do. Where we should eat. Enough is enough."

Its interesting that Muslims within the same region [Canada], both speaking from their area of power could have different viewpoint on an issue involving the liberty of its women. According to the article it was the Canadian Muslim Congress who called for a ban of the burka or niqab in public. Their rationale: "the right [to wear the burka] should not be protected by the Charter's guarantee of religious freedom because nowhere in the Koran is there a requirement for women to cover their faces in public." They argue that the burka "marginalizes women." The burka is central to this battle between the modern and historical perception of what the Muslim woman should be. When looked at that from that perspective there potentially is an argument to be had. However, Imam Rageah's languauge merits rebuke regardless of who it's intended for. Traditional concepts are continually being challenged, thus the better approach would be for Imam Rageah to continue encouraging his congregation (as he has), to contact their members of congress to voice their concerns. The same Congress who proposed the legislation in the first place. Such an approach is less likely to draw negative attention to a religion or congregation.

-O.Lucius

Statistics

Google Image
π

There are many recent studies that reflect on shifts in modern day population, especially when it comes to religion. There was the bold Newsweek front cover in April declaring "The End of Christian America". An article rehashing statistics from the 2009 American Religious Identification Survey, which showed a 10% decrease in self identifying Christians in America. A roughly ten times greater drop that that of self identifying Jews and Muslims. There was an article on the Guardian website discussing the spread of Islam, stating that 20% of the world's Muslim population live in countries where they are considered the minority. Countries such as America where 2.5 million Muslims live (0.8% of the population). Yet combined, Muslims make up 23% of the world population (est. 1.57 billion Muslims). Most recently, but not lastly is the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life article, discussing the possibility of one in five Americans becoming secular by the year 2030. The latest article is interesting because it can be tied in with personal encounters of mine. Within the past year a few people I know have said to me that they are now either agnostic or atheist. All of the above having grown up in one religious affiliation or another, and are some of the most active public servants I know. Most religions teach people to practice the things that these non believer do as second nature, "do good". Why is it that so many people are "loosing faith"? The Pew article which uses information of Trinity College researchers clarifies that secular doesn't solely mean agnostic or atheist. In this secular group referred to as American Nones, "more than 50% believe in either a higher being or a personal God, while only 7 % are self-proclaimed atheists. One in three say they "definitely" believe that humans developed from earlier species of animals." Also according to the study Nones are an invisible minority similar in nature to the general population in terms of marital status, education, racial/ethnic makeup and income. Also more men than women claim to have no religion (or are nones), 19 % and 12% respectively. In terms of their political presence,a large percentage of Nones decline to identify with a political party, more than 40% call themselves independents; 34% say they're Democrats; and 13% Republican. With the study proclaiming that 20% of the American population will identify with no religion in 20 years, Jesse Galef of the Secular Coalition for America hopes that this potentially growing trend "will dispel stereotypes that Nones have no morals because of their lack of religion and help them gain a political voice."

- O. Lucius

Moral Drum Beating.

Google Image
π

The open call on Aug. 19th, hosted by Faithful America as part of their "40 days for Health Care Reform" campaign, was an orchestrated move within the debate for universal health care. Everything from the questions, participating faith representatives, and government officials including the President played their roles carefully to ensure that their message was coming from a united front. Despite a few technical problems including the 15 years old flubbing the President's name as she introduced him, the call went rather smoothly. Pastors, Priests, Rabbis and other religious representatives across the United States recited what their congregations were doing to advanced their belief that all of God's children deserve to be in good health. Officials like the Director for the office of Domestic Policy at the White House, Melody Barnes -- graciously took questions, and answered them with an even toned voice almost as if to diffuse any perceived tension from adversarial questions. With most of the debate to this point being hinged on the rumored funding of abortion and support for death panels, one question offered up during the call showed such concerns in a different light. A women, who identified herself as Catholic stated her urge to support health care, but that her conflict comes with possibility that reform came with funding for abortion, something that would compromise her moral & ethical convictions. Melody Barnes assured her that Americans will be able to purchase health care that should both match their belief systems and health care needs.

The President took the debate a little further; by dispelling rumors for support of death panels, which he said is not an attempt to institute the legalization of medical suicide. Instead it simply is a voluntary program where patients who sought out counseling for creating living wills could be reimbursed. He also denounced rumors that the health care reform package was to help illegal aliens, or a governmental take over of the health care system. The President sprinkled a few biblical references in his speech such as, "baring false witness" when referring to reform adversaries, his favorite used through out the campaign -- "I am my brother's/sister's keeper", and closing the call with the common gesture of "May God bless you". This live call in which over 140,000 people called in or listen to online, was a way for the President and health care reform supporters to frame it as a "Moral imperative","an ethical obligation", and an encouragement for supporters to start a "moral drumbeat". One minister even went as far to say that health care reform is part of "God's desire for health & healing for our nation".

Another important point made by the President and other participants on the call is that health care reform doesn't only apply to the 47+ million people without coverage, but the millions more who currently have and can't afford their current health care plans. As health care supporters officially/unofficially, continue to recite their reasons for support of this new health care reform packages, and the faith/non faith communities continue to do rallies and forums, write their political representatives, sponsor events, and even write op-eds in their local papers and church bulletins -- on thing is for sure; this debate is not over. This was a concerted effort for this Administration to extend the "olive branch" to the faith community and have dialogue (albeit choreographed). This call which had solid sponsorship from over 30 institutions like the Islamic society of North America, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, African Methodist Episcopal Church (AME), The Latino Leadership Circle, Unitarian Universalist Association, and Catholics United was just the beginning.

SPIRITUAL GROWTH

Google Image
π

When asked about things involving the future, whether it be the environment, nuclear weapons, electoral politics, or how to keep a traditional organization like the church relevant, the answer seems to steadily point to the youth. If the decisions of leaders are not done on the youth's behalf, its done "because" of the youth, or better yet "for the sake of the" youth. So speaking of youth "What's [a] better way to get to the heart of the nation's youth?" According to Franklin Graham, son of Evangelist Billy Graham; its through an "evangelical summer concert tour". The "Rock the River Tour", aims to reach young Christians through music, while encouraging them to bring their "un-churched friends", and receive the timeless message that God has a plan for their lives. The tour starts in Baton Rouge Louisiana, makes four stops and ends in St. Paul Minnesota in mid august. In full youth inquisitive mode [insert an eager raised hand here], question: What happened to the rest of the United States. Are all of the young evangelicals and their rock/hip hop loving un-churched friends living in this selective space, or are they all required to migrate there like missionaries for the tour? All of the advertisement efforts to reach out have mostly been done via smart phones and social networking sites. Even the Graham press kit has been tweaked to appeal to the "star struck, athlete idolizing youth". Franklin Graham's biography is included in the kit, entitled "How a Rebel Began to Preach". In which Grahma talks about his "rebillious" years when he supposedly had long hair , rode a Harley, and smoked. Will this work? Perhaps. The youth generally speaking, can be unpredictable and more receptive to new approaches (see the election of Barack H. Obama). For all the bad press that the evangelical movement may receive, their effort in this regard at the very least should garner some notice.

MIND OVER MATTER

Google Image
π

In President Obama's middle east speech marathon, its interesting the degree of attention given to the speech at Cairo University versus that at the Holocaust Memorial. This speaks to how much the past dictates matters of the present, or at least the interpretation of present events. Given the recent history of an interpreted American "war on [Islamic] extremism, there was much anticipation as to how the Muslim world would receive the President's words. Major media outlets had been baiting the Cairo speech for months prior. This to some, may have rendered the arguably equally important speech at Buchenwald, less so. Perhaps indirect messages like this is what lead a young Jewish gentleman during an overheard conversation recently to express his concerns with the President's stand for Israel. Interestingly enough, his friends sparked back expressing their belief that the president was one of them. Citing the First Lady's Rabbi cousin as proof. Its important to be note that in familiar things misconceptions are tested. The focus has been placed for so long on the perceived tension between America and the Islamic world, that potential events such as the shooting at the Holocaust museum in D.C, were not properly intercepted and followed up. The recent unrest in Tehran shows that people, no matter the nation are the ultimate voice of every voice in that particular situation. If they are happy we will know. If they are abused we will know. If they are cheated, we will know that too. If they are hurt, we will hear their cry [of rebellion]. In familiar things as well, people find peace, and a call for peace in any corner of the world, has the potential to make the universe a tad bit more stable. Much like N. Korea's threat to continue testing missiles, possibly as close to home as Hawaii undermines national boundaries of all nations. No one or two speeches can fix years of patterns, but continued dialogue will give a potential new listener the opportunity of reinterpretation.

-O.Lucius

MARATHON

President Obama's Speech Marathon.

THE IRONY of CONTRADICTION v.s. THE POWER OF REASON.

Google Image

π

How Ironic is it that one can be pro-life and a murderer at the same time? Arguably there are social ills that are becoming mainstream these days, but this is contradiction at its best. In trying to think o
f a motive that would lead someone to murder Dr. Tiller, the least insane is that perhaps in ending his life, it will stop him from performing more late term abortions. However that rationale wilts in comparison to the fact that this will not halt the practice of abortion or the pro choice argument. Crudely, such actions send an extreme message of intolerance, and may possibly do more harm for the pro-life cause. Just ask Sarah Palin.

Statement: "I feel sorrow for the Tiller family. I respect the sanctity of life and the tragedy that took place today in Kansas clearly violates respect for life. This murder also damages the positive message of life, for the unborn, and for those living. Ask yourself, 'What will those who have not yet decided personally where they stand on this issue take away from today's event in Kansas?'

Regardless of my strong objection to Dr. Tiller's abortion practices, violence is never an answer in advancing the pro-life message."

Credentials:
Gov. Palin has a staunchly pro-life record. She opposes abortion in most cases; rape and incest, except when a mother's life is in danger.

- O.Lucius

popePhone? I'LL PASS!

Google Image

The Vatican, after dissenting just a year ago- is attempting to link the church and it's young followers through facebook and iphone applications. So aside from some initial thoughts of his poor politics- (with flip flopping on the issue)- and dismissing all comparisons of him to Diddy's pointless tweets, I remain disturbed with the idea of linking technology and church. I mean the religious rule book referenced is about a couple thousand years old. Somethings I'm just not so comfortable 'upgrading'.

So I'm not catholic, but I am Christian- and the thought of my pastor just sort of feeding his scriptures to my iphone disturbs me. My church family is just that to me- family, and I certainly wouldn't want to have a family reunion through facebook. To be quite honest- I have began to rely on facebook as the sole communication with many of my friends and we rarely talk on the phone or meet for coffee. So while I've accepted this with them, it's not what I'd like my relationship with my church to turn into. Monsignor Paul Tighe, secretary of those responsible for the site, said himself that 'If a church does not communicate then it ceases to be a church'- I find it rather ironic that they have accepted sending bits of a previous speech on facebook postcards as communication. Perhaps they have given up on being a church.

I think many things can be advanced and improved and modified- but the establishments of God aren't included. Matthew 16:18 "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Now if the church was established to withstand the gates of hell, I'm sure it will survive a technology wave. So while I access my bible from my iphone and even take notes in church on it- I think to better the relationship between young people and the church is going to require a relationship! Not facebook postcards, but true communication as Tighe mentioned as a requirement of the very establishment.

- S. Bryant

FEDERAL FAITH

Google Image
π

Are we being served Church and State with a twist? Its seems so! Instead of out with the old, in with the new President Obama is revamping the old Faith Based Office and injecting some new elements to it. While the office under George W. Bush may have left some with a bad taste in their mouth for being perceived as reigniting culture wars, under President Obama the office's has a new title and mission(s).The "White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships", headed by Joshua DuBois, the Obama presidential campaign director of religious affairs, seeks to do more than just help social service groups receive federal aid.

According to a Feb 5, 2009 White House press release, the office has four key priorities:

• The Office’s top priority will be making community groups an integral part of our economic recovery and poverty a burden fewer have to bear when recovery is complete.
• It will be one voice among several in the administration that will look at how we support women and children, address teenage pregnancy, and reduce the need for abortion.
• The Office will strive to support fathers who stand by their families, which involves working to get young men off the streets and into well-paying jobs, and encouraging responsible fatherhood.
• Finally, beyond American shores this Office will work with the National Security Council to foster interfaith dialogue with leaders and scholars around the world.
  

While the administration has received healthy doses of praise and criticism for the restoration of this office, the first test of how open dialogue will be comes with the postponed announcement of whether religious groups will be required to higher personnel outside of their particular faith, in order to receive federal funds. According to a post under the religion section of U.S.News & World Reports, "Liberal groups say they'll object to such state-sponsored discrimination. Conservative religious groups say they'll back out of Obama's faith-based program if they're forced to hire from outside of their faith traditions."

Check Out US News & World Report's Top 10 Obama Faith Moments:
click links to read more.

1. Rick Warren's Inauguration Day Invocation
2. Granting First TV Interview to Arabic Language Network
3. Reversing Mexico City Policy on Family Planning Providers Abroad
4. Opening Rallies With Prayer
5. Launching White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships
6. Convening a Faith Advisory Council
7. Joe Biden's Receiving Ashes on Ash Wednesday
8. Lifting Restrictions on Federally-Funded Embryonic Stem Cell Research
9. Announcing Plans to Give Notre Dame's Commencement Address
10. Speaking to Muslim World From Turkey

- O.Lucius